Modernizing Gun Control: Keeping Up with a Dynamically Evolving Industry

The rapid evolution of modern technology has brought forward new questions on how to sufficiently regulate the use of firearms.

For years, gun manufacturers have been circumventing restrictions on assault weapons by implementing cosmetic design changes to new guns. Meanwhile, the government’s list of prohibited firearms have not been updated since 1995.

By failing to keep up with the evolution of gun designs, many powerful semi-automatic and sniper rifles are currently available on the market as non-restricted hunting rifles. This illustrates the importance for gun laws to be proactive in addressing public safety concerns as opposed to addressing the concerns once are prevalent.

In recent years, two notable revolutions in the technology space have received little attention by Parliament: 1) 3D printing technology; and 2) deep web networks.

3D printing technology allows users to produce fully-functional firearms from downloaded digital blueprints. This allows anyone to bypass gun-licensing requirements and assemble firearms without any particular skill or expertise. As of this moment, some organizations are developing such blueprints to be freely distributed online. Furthermore, the fact that 3D-printed firearms are made from plastic material means that these weapons would bypass metal detectors.

At the present time, there are no laws in place to sufficiently control the distribution of 3D printed firearms blueprints.

Recent years have also witnessed the rise and fall of Silk Road, an untraceable online black market for illegal products and services such as firearms. Many retailers make weapons legally available for sale online, while some online classifieds contain listings for private sales where there are no guaranteed licence checks (especially since the repeal of the registry). But new untraceable deep-web networks emerging since the fall of Silk Road facilitate explicitly illegal transactions, with some networks purported to have even larger user bases than that of Silk Road.

Using IP masking technology and digital currency, deep-web networks allow for the anonymous transfer of illegal goods. As digital anonymization technology continues to evolve, the deep-web may soon flourish as a primary source of illegal firearms.

Amidst these growing concerns, the development of smart gun technology as a viable solution has been given even less attention. This technology has the potential to prevent gun crimes by limiting its use to licensed individuals using biometrics and radio frequency identification (RFID). The United States Attorney General has expressed an interest in exploring the technology, while the European Commission has also stated its commitment to implementing smart guns in a recent report on firearms:

“The Commission will work with the firearms industry to explore technological solutions, such as biometric sensors where personal data is stored in the firearm, for ensuring that purchased firearms may only be used by their legal owner. It will carry out a detailed cost-benefit analysis on the question of making such ‘smart gun’ security features mandatory for firearms lawfully sold in the EU.”

Evidently, as the Common Sense Firearms Licensing Act continues to be debated in Parliament, there is a need to review the rapidly-evolving landscape of firearms and consider technological solutions in response to emerging technological concerns.



4 thoughts on “Modernizing Gun Control: Keeping Up with a Dynamically Evolving Industry

  1. The classification of firearms should be very simple and not require extensive modification every couple of years. Fully automatic weapons should be prohibioted, weapons shorter than say 660mm (the current limit) should be restricted, and all others non-restricted. Simple, all you need to tell the classification is a tape measure.


  2. So when you say – “For years, gun manufacturers have been circumventing restrictions on assault weapons by implementing cosmetic design changes to new guns”, – are you finally admitting that the characteristics which differenciate an “assault weapon” from a regular firearm are purely cosmetic, and have nothing to do with function and mechanism?

    If cosmetic changes are all that are required to circumvey gun laws, then it means gun control laws and their advocates fail to understand what the pro-gun lobby has been trying to tell them for years ; restricting firearm ownership based on what is scary-looking and what isn’t constitutes an utter failure.


      1. That makes as much sense as most of the anti gun statements here and elsewhere. The anti gun platform is based on naivety at best. The so called “controls” are laughable and never fact based. Even a seven year old would scoff at the notion that a 4.2 inch barrel on a handgun is somehow safer than one that is 4.0 inches long or that a .25 caliber is more dangerous than a .22. Gun control is a total failure just about everywhere it has been implemented including places like the UK which is not one iota safer after its restrictions as violent crime has actually increased because the criminal is safer from resistance. The very best that can be said about gun control is that it’s totally ineffective. If we want relative freedom from violence, there are many better ways to approach the real issues. Ignorance is one of the enemies and the anti gun folks are guilty as charged every time common sense and facts are used against their positions.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s